Welcome to the DIFC Courts website. To optimise the experience, this website only uses strictly necessary cookies.
The DIFC Courts takes your privacy very seriously and respects the importance of security on the internet. DIFC Courts websites use cookies and similar technologies for various purposes including to distinguish you from other users of our websites. By continuing to use our websites, you agree to our cookie policy.
What cookies do we use?
Cookies are text files containing small amounts of information. They are downloaded to your computer or device when you visit a website. They don’t tell us who you are but they do enable us to recognise your device and where you have made various preferences or actions they enable us to remember them.
Why do we use cookies?
Cookies do lots of different jobs, like letting you navigate between web pages efficiently, remembering your preferences, and generally improving your experience of our websites. The cookies can help to ensure that adverts you see online are more relevant to you and your interests.
Disabling cookies
DIFC Courts websites are designed to function optimally with cookies enabled. You can, however, disable cookies via your website browser settings. This may mean, however, that you may no longer have access to some of our website features. Please note that even with all cookies disabled, a tiny amount of information will continue to be retrieved from your web browser. This information is necessary for the basic functioning of our website.
Changes to our cookie policy
We may change this cookie policy from time to time. If we make changes, we will notify you by revising the date on this policy and in some cases by adding notices on our homepage or other websites or sending you email updates (where data protection laws allow this).
Contact us
If you have any questions about our cookie policy you can contact us at: ithelpdesk@difccourts.ae
CFI 027/2012 Christopher James McDuff v KBH Kaanuun Limited
April 20, 2014 court of first instance - Orders,Orders
UPON reviewing the Defendant's Appeal Notice and supporting documents dated 27 February 2014;
AND UPON reviewing the relevant documents in the case file;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Leave to appeal against the Judgment of H.E. Justice Ali Al Madhani dated 4 March 2014 is denied on the basis that the Court considers that the appeal would have a real prospect of success, pursuant to Rule 44.8(1) of the Rules of the DIFC Courts.
2. The Appellant's application for a stay of the execution of the judgment is denied, but the Appellant may pay the judgment sum into Court, in accordance with Part 33 of the Rules of the DIFC Courts, pending the outcome of the appeal.
Issued by:Mark BeerRegistrarDate of Issue: 20 April 2014At: 3pm