Welcome to the DIFC Courts website. To optimise the experience, this website only uses strictly necessary cookies.
The DIFC Courts takes your privacy very seriously and respects the importance of security on the internet. DIFC Courts websites use cookies and similar technologies for various purposes including to distinguish you from other users of our websites. By continuing to use our websites, you agree to our cookie policy.
What cookies do we use?
Cookies are text files containing small amounts of information. They are downloaded to your computer or device when you visit a website. They don’t tell us who you are but they do enable us to recognise your device and where you have made various preferences or actions they enable us to remember them.
Why do we use cookies?
Cookies do lots of different jobs, like letting you navigate between web pages efficiently, remembering your preferences, and generally improving your experience of our websites. The cookies can help to ensure that adverts you see online are more relevant to you and your interests.
Disabling cookies
DIFC Courts websites are designed to function optimally with cookies enabled. You can, however, disable cookies via your website browser settings. This may mean, however, that you may no longer have access to some of our website features. Please note that even with all cookies disabled, a tiny amount of information will continue to be retrieved from your web browser. This information is necessary for the basic functioning of our website.
Changes to our cookie policy
We may change this cookie policy from time to time. If we make changes, we will notify you by revising the date on this policy and in some cases by adding notices on our homepage or other websites or sending you email updates (where data protection laws allow this).
Contact us
If you have any questions about our cookie policy you can contact us at: ithelpdesk@difccourts.ae
CFI 033/2017 Bankmed (Sal) Trading In The Difc Under The Trade Name Bankmed (Dubai) v (1) Fast Telecom General Trading LLC (2) Ali Mohammed Salem Abu Adas (3) Mohammad Jawdat Ayesh Mustafa Al Bargouthi (4) Saif Saeed Sulaiman Mohamed Al Mazrouei (5) Ibrahim Saif Hormodi (6) Ahmed Abdel Kader Hamdan Zahran
November 07, 2017 court of first instance - Judgements
BANKMED (SAL) TRADING IN THE DIFC UNDER THE TRADE NAME BANKMED (DUBAI)
Claimants
and
(1) FAST TELECOM GENERAL TRADING LLC
(2) ALI MOHAMMED SALEM ABU ADAS
(3) MOHAMMAD JAWDAT AYESH MUSTAFA AL BARGOUTHI
(4) SAIF SAEED SULAIMAN MOHAMED AL MAZROUEI
(5) IBRAHIM SAIF HORMODI
(6) AHMED ABDEL KADER HAMDAN ZAHRAN
Defendants
DEFAULT JUDGMENT MADE BY JUDICIAL OFFICER NASSIR AL NASSER
UPON the request made by the Claimants on 22 October 2017 for a Default Judgment against the Defendant (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) in accordance with Rule 13.1 (1) and (2) of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (“RDC”), it is found as follows:
The request is not one prohibited by RDC 13.3 (1) or (2).
The Defendant has filed an Acknowledgment of Service but has failed to file a Defence and the relevant time for so doing has expired (RDC 13.5(1)).
The Defendant has not: (i) applied to the DIFC Courts to have the Claimant’s statement of case struck out under RDC 4.16; or for immediate judgment under RDC Part 24 (RDC 13.6(1)); (ii) satisfied the whole claim (including any claim for costs) on which the Claimant is seeking judgment; or (iii) filed or served on the Claimant an admission under RDC 15.14 or 15.24 together with a request for time to pay (RDC 13.6(3)).
The Claimant filed a Certificate of Service in accordance with RDC 9.43 on 19 October 2017 that service of the Particulars of claim occured on 3 October 2017.
The Claimant has followed the required procedure for obtaining Default Judgment RDC 13.7 and 13.8.
The claim is for a specified sum of money and the request specifies the date by which the whole of the judgment debt is to be paid or the times and rate at which it is to be paid by instalments (RDC 13.9).
The request includes a request for interest pursuant to RDC 13.14 and the Claim Form sets out the calculation of interest in the claim.
The DIFC Courts are satisfied that the conditions of RDC 13.22 and RDC 13.23 regarding Defendants served outside of the jurisdiction have been met.
The Claimant has submitted evidence, as required by RDC 13.24, that (i) the claim is one that the DIFC Courts have power to hear and decide; (ii) no other court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide the claim; and (iii) the claim has been properly served (RDC 13.22/13.23).
ACCORDINGLY IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The request is granted.
The Defendants shall pay the Claimant the sum of USD $ 14,463,479.03 plus interest at the rate of 12.4 % per annum.
The Defendants shall pay the Claimant interest in the sum of USD $1,252,120.57 from the date 30 November 2016 until 26 October 2017.
The interest shall accrue at a daily rate of USD $5,260.00 from the date the Default Judgment is issued until the date of payment.
The Claimants shall bear their own costs of the application.